Monday, February 28, 2005

New Features

The first few in a string of tinkerings, here's what's new on this page.

1. Recent Comments
On the right, just below the post listings, you'll see who's been commenting on what recently. Keep current on what's being said in response.

2. Expandable Comments
When you click on the "[number] comments" link at the end of a post, the comments appear right away beneath. Just scroll down.

3. Link list
Also on the right, near the bottom; a list of other sites that we recommend or are produced by mutual friends. Email David with additions.

1 Comments:

Blogger Matt said...

David, Thank you for helping us with this. MPC

3/02/2005 11:41:00 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday, February 20, 2005

Les americains idealistes?

President & Mrs. Bush are takin' off for Europe to "mend fences," according to CNN. On the subject, our President said the following:

"We do not accept a false caricature that divides the Western world between an idealistic United States and a cynical Europe. America and Europe are the pillars of the free world," he said. "We share the same belief in freedom and the rights of every individual, and we are working together across the globe to advance our common interest and common values."

What do you guys think? Is this a "false caricature"? Does it cause a truly grave division, or is it a harmless form of satire to see things this way, a sort-of backwards way of appreciating differences by poking fun?

4 Comments:

Blogger Matt said...

My thoughts are this…The President of the United States going to Europe to mend fences is a complete waste of time and a waste of our tax dollars. Until the corrupt governments in Europe admit to participating in the $64 Billion dollar scandal also known as the United Nations oil-for-food program and forgive Iraq of the moneys owed to them by Saddam, (who really doesn’t have the money for a good defense lawyer much less, Johnny Cochran), and not by anyone else including the elected government of Iraq.

The United States should be looking as to what countries in the world want to work with the United States of America for a better world. We should embrace these countries and work with them and give those countries whatever help we can.

The fact that this country is the greatest on earth shouldn’t be a drawback to other countries in the world. If they don’t want money from the United States or its citizens, don’t ask for it and furthermore we shouldn’t give it to them. If they don’t want to be our friend, fine. We should pull our embassy out of said country and tell our citizens that they are on there own in that country.

I for one am sick and tired of the United States being the punching bag for Europe. In the next war, you know who will come to their aid, the United States, but as soon as it is over they will complain that we stepped on their mushrooms and pissed in there wine. And of course the United States will be the insurance company of the world and pay to fix everything and make it all better.

Fight your own battles, go to work and stop complaining about the only country that stepped up and made sure that you weren’t all speaking German right now.

2/21/2005 11:39:00 PM

 
Blogger David said...

As for fun-poking, it would not be diplomatically useful for Bush to make a crack about the "French Military School of Our Lady of Capitulation" and Chirac to call him a fat ignoramus in return (wait, didn't he already do that?). Things get taken the wrong way, etc. In most cases, it's not the appropriate way for world leaders to publicly appreciate their differences.

For many citizens on both sides, it probably is a harmless form of satire (Triplets of Belleville, anyone?). But when satire turns mean-spirited, the satirist can easily spawn division despite any "not my intention" protests.

We do have plenty of cynics on our own shores as well; they just aren't President at the moment.

I think a true leader should be mangnanimous, even humble enough to maintain diplomatic good will with foriegn powers, however unhelpful they were in certain endeavors. It's no waste to be the better man, especially when representing a country.

Caricatures only work when, beneath the distortion, the true image is still recognizable. A "false caricature" wouldn't have any staying power.

Drop the word "false," and I think he's got the right approach.

2/22/2005 07:20:00 AM

 
Blogger Abbey von Gohren said...

Whereas I understand Matt's point- of-view, I agree with David that humility is an essential component of our attitude towards Europe and the rest of the world. God has blessed this great Nation (and our current leader) with a paradoxical mixture of humility and pride. I think Matt expressed quite well the pride and patriotism on an American, but this must be augmented by humility and forgiveness. Both points of view are necessary, and either one may be (and has been) mis-understood since our country came into being. One of the things that makes America great is having citizens on both sides of the paradox, so we balance each other out.

I guess I see America coming of age. We still have have ideals, but these ideals are being tempered by difficult situations. (WWI & WWII, 9-11, etc.) We must pray for this country and its leaders to keep their American pride and yet continue to sacrifice themselves humbly on the behalf of the downtrodden.

2/22/2005 08:16:00 AM

 
Blogger Matt said...

http://powerlineblog.com/archives/2005_02.php#009642

2/22/2005 10:45:00 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, February 16, 2005

When a movie is essentially quotable ...

Someone's bound to record the essential quotes.

2 Comments:

Blogger Matt said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

2/16/2005 11:27:00 PM

 
Blogger Matt said...

http://drakeshangout.com/humor/soundboards/officespace.htm

2/16/2005 11:30:00 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday, February 13, 2005

Sideways

Steph,

Your
torturing silence on the subject of the film "Sideways" has been too much to bear. All I have been privy to so far is : 1) what I seen from the preview and 2) the fact that you and David needed a stiff glass of wine afterwards. I have suffered long in my ignorance, but tonight it ends. We are going to see it. Ha!

-A.

9 Comments:

Blogger David said...

Me too ... refraining from revealing my opinion is killing me.

2/13/2005 09:29:00 PM

 
Blogger Matt said...

I saw the film “Sideways” last night. If you don’t want to know what I think, skip this post.
(Spoilers ahead)
.
Good Movie.
.
I'm a thumbprint on the first-floor window of a skyscraper, a smudge of excrement on a tissue surging out to sea along with millions of tons of raw sewage.
.
Did you drink and dial?
.
Priceless…..

2/13/2005 11:53:00 PM

 
Blogger Abbey von Gohren said...

Okay. Well, for starters, it was an amusing movie in the laugh out loud sense. That is, I cracked a chuckle at a fairly good clip. (See oneliners cited above.)

There was one HUGE turn-off, and that was Miles' friend's apalling behaviour. I week to the wedding and he is chasing every (I mean EVERY) skirt that comes his way. At first I just called him a jerk. Then I began to see him through Miles' eyes - basically, that he's a pitiful human being. The scene when he's tearfully begging Miles to go back and get his wedding rings. (By the way - why the tears? Is he genuinely in love with his fiancee or is it another act? K & I were discussing this....)

I liked the character of Maia, because she was the only truly upstanding individual, but she also seemed a little flat in this way. Too predictable. Same with Stephanie, only she's the other extreme. They gave her a daughter and a cool job at a winery to make her seem deep, I suppose. But she just seemed like your typical party girl that could be found on any American University campus.

Miles' character, of course, was most often in the spotlight, and I thought he developped throughout the film rather nicely (albeit awkwardly!) He, too, had his pitiful moments, but they were to good ends.

The scenery was beautiful, and the hardest thing was WATCHING people drink wine steadily for 2 hours without being able to participate. So I say: Napa Valley or bust!!!!

2/14/2005 10:52:00 AM

 
Blogger Karl said...

I think what the movie was about mostly was male sexuality and the struggle in finding identity (however fleeting) within it. James (Miles' friend?) is converting his indentity from player to monogamist, albiet gradually....

Then the contrast between informed experience and salesmenship could'nt be more severe between the 2 guys. James does'nt know what he drinks or what he should find in each sip. His palette wasn't figurative and niether was his enjoyment of women. To him they were as plain as ripe berries waiting to be picked. But he could sell the book that was "published" and turn it into something present.

Miles was the savorer. Talking about his ex, describing wine and cherishing each bit of pain from his own life through his less than succinct book were acts of savor. But while he worked words, all he had was the literal in daily life. His moral sense could'nt sell anything that was'nt already there qny better than he could sell his own book.

Not only that but the intermittent code of conduct and consequences for pick-up sex. The values are not just different than christian values, but appear to shift constantly, like when Stephanie complains "but you said you loved me?!". She seems to mean a few days of sex then poof, never hear from the person again was OK to her.

2/14/2005 09:05:00 PM

 
Blogger Karl said...

So long as don't profess love.

2/14/2005 09:19:00 PM

 
Blogger Karl said...

And wrecking your friend's car to cover up your fooling around is another fine act of salesmanship.

2/14/2005 09:24:00 PM

 
Blogger Matt said...

I guess I see myself in the character of Miles (Paul Giamatti). Miles is an open wound of a man, drowned in self-loathing and wine (which eventually reveals itself to be a metaphor for the character), and while Giamatti has played this type of role before (many, many times), he does a magnificent job finding the slippery edges to the character, forging his best performance yet. Miles is a heartbreaker, not only because his life is falling apart around him, but because he recognizes the crumbling as it happens. Its gut-wrenching work often infused with a welcome subtlety that the actor has never displayed before. The Director of ‘Sideways’ has made an absorbing and funny film about two losers on a wine tasting road trip. Usually I would avoid at all cost a movie with a singular focus that has little intrest to me, and the rest of the general public, but the casting of this film is one of the best I have ever seen.

2/15/2005 11:38:00 AM

 
Blogger Abbey von Gohren said...

"Quaffable but far from transcendent" is perhaps the best summary? But, where's David's opinion? I hope refraining from it didn't really kill him...

2/15/2005 12:43:00 PM

 
Blogger David said...

Abbey just stole my summary. Thanks a lot.

I was similarly appalled by whats-his-name's behavior, and spent a good chunk of time wishing that Miles would stand up to him.

It's not even a Rake's Progress of dissolution, more of a Rake's "Minor Consequences Only" Holiday.

Admittedly (with some grudging) it is a realistic bit of writing in that it doesn't moralize, doesn't tie everything up in a nice good-is-rewarded-evil-is-punished ending (where's Dickens when you need him?).

Ending felt Lost in Translation-esque, but less effective. Ambiguity for the sake of ambiguity, not because it was a better way to end our glimpse of Miles.

QBFFT. It's the acronym of the week.

2/16/2005 09:43:00 AM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Monday, February 07, 2005

Required Tasting

Hey guys!

This looks like a pretty helpful website, at least for us simple folk who didn't know what a Tempranillo grape was off the top of our heads.....

http://www.cellarnotes.net/

2 Comments:

Blogger Abbey von Gohren said...

Yes!!!!!!!
We haven't had a bad Estancia yet, no matter what the varietal. (Although I have a particular fondness for the Pinot Noir, too.)

Haven't hung out in SO long. SO busy we all are. We'll just have to make time sometime SOON.

2/10/2005 04:45:00 PM

 
Blogger Abbey von Gohren said...

We're in for sure. Also, I got the invite passed off to Nikki and Jordan.

2/13/2005 06:19:00 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Sunday, February 06, 2005

More required reading

The Christian Classics Ethereal Library: http://ccel.org/
I do have a few favorites.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, February 04, 2005

The Table

FYI: The Garden Wall Serenaders appear at the Kitty Kat Club, February 10th, 9ish to 12ish. !4th St and 4th Ave, SE, Dinkytown by Loring Pasta Bar. This is the 1930s crooner band I've been talking about, with the addition of bassist Matt Belz and english/spanish singer Andrea. Expect to be ravaged latin lover style through your ears!

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, February 03, 2005

Whoa - - -a blog, man!............OK, we've all seen them. Now here is one for us to share whatever a bunch of music/food junkies tend to write.

Cheers, -Karl

3 Comments:

Blogger Site 27 said...

I'm presently in the middle of incorporating in an attempt to eek my way out of some added payroll taxes that I'd otherwise be required to pay as a sole proprietorship. I'm painfully aware as to how much Uncle Sam is willing to dip into my personal earnings. What most fail to realize is how much the government actually takes from the average U.S. citizen each year. Has anyone come across any hard numbers? I’d be interested in seeing some. For low-income folk like me, I believe income tax is around 36%-38% (this includes payroll taxes, Medicare, FICA, Social Security, etc.). Okay, so there’s the initial cut. Want to drive somewhere? You’ll pay 40.4 cents per gallon in gas tax in Minnesota. Buy a candy bar at the gas station (or anything for that matter) and you’re slapped with 6.5% sales tax. Anyone who owns property knows first-hand the hit you take in property taxes. Think about the double and triple tax you pay after everyone in the supply chain (say for your candy bar, i.e. peanut farmers, cocoa suppliers, sugar refineries, etc.) pays their taxes and then passes the markup along to you at the point of purchase. I wonder if someone has calculated the average % rate of tax burden carried by U.S. residents.

2/09/2005 09:36:00 AM

 
Blogger Abbey von Gohren said...

In light of the hefty taxes that we pay, does not anyone else besides me find President Bush's concept of personal/private accounts like a breath of fresh air? I mean, what is everybody (i.e., the media) so afraid of? Do they really believe that an enormous bureaucratic structure (i.e. the government) is able to take care of my returment funds better than we as individuals can? Admittedly, the Bush admin.'s plan is revolutionary & will incite some serious upheaval - but might it be an antidote to all of this excessive taxing.

2/09/2005 12:24:00 PM

 
Blogger Abbey von Gohren said...

Admittedly, the security IS taken out of social security. But then again, so is SOCIAL. (Because he's obviously proposing a privatization of funds.) So, he's abolishing social security, not reforming it. As far as I'm concerned, so much the better. ; )

2/11/2005 06:34:00 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home